Course 2020-2021 a.y.

50064 - CIVIL LIBERTIES AND HUMAN RIGHTS

Department of Law

Course taught in English
Go to class group/s: 31
CLMG (6 credits - I sem. - OP  |  IUS/21) - M (6 credits - I sem. - OP  |  IUS/21) - IM (6 credits - I sem. - OP  |  IUS/21) - MM (6 credits - I sem. - OP  |  IUS/21) - AFC (6 credits - I sem. - OP  |  IUS/21) - CLELI (6 credits - I sem. - OP  |  IUS/21) - ACME (6 credits - I sem. - OP  |  IUS/21) - DES-ESS (6 credits - I sem. - OP  |  IUS/21) - EMIT (6 credits - I sem. - OP  |  IUS/21) - GIO (6 credits - I sem. - OP  |  IUS/21) - DSBA (6 credits - I sem. - OP  |  IUS/21) - PPA (6 credits - I sem. - OP  |  IUS/21) - FIN (6 credits - I sem. - OP  |  IUS/21)
Course Director:
GRAZIELLA ROMEO

Classes: 31 (I sem.)
Instructors:
Class 31: GRAZIELLA ROMEO


Mission & Content Summary

MISSION

Rights are examples of ‘Essentially contested concepts’. Their meaning, level of protection and the balance between competing rights and interests are open to debate. Understanding the contemporary dynamics of rights protection requires a closer look to the mechanisms envisaged for their protection not only at the national, but also at the supranational (EU) level. Starting from such premises, the aim of the course is to explore how civil liberties and human rights are protected in practice the European context.

CONTENT SUMMARY

The course starts with a historical outlook of the concepts of ‘civil liberties’ and ‘human rights’, to then focus on the protection mechanisms at both the national and supranational levels. The main topics of the course are:

  • Concepts and conceptualizations of rights from an historical and comparative perspective.
  • The protection of fundamental rights in the national context.
  • The protection of fundamental rights in the EU context.
  • The interplay between the EU and the ECHR.
  • The interplay between the EU, the ECHR and national systems as far as the protection of fundamental rights is concerned.

Intended Learning Outcomes (ILO)

KNOWLEDGE AND UNDERSTANDING

At the end of the course student will be able to...
  • At the end of the course student will be able to...

  • Understand fundamental rights and civil liberties in their historical and geographical context.
  • Identify the mechanisms envisaged by both domestic and European Union law for the protection of fundamental rights.
  • Understand the interplay between national and European case law on the protection of fundamental rights.
  • Critically assess the protection of rights in the context of the European multilevel legal orders.

APPLYING KNOWLEDGE AND UNDERSTANDING

At the end of the course student will be able to...
  • At the end of the course student will be able to...

  • Understand the basic concepts which characterise the European multilevel legal order in relation to fundamental rights.
  • Identify the instruments for the protection of rights in the European multilevel legal order.
  • Critically evaluate potential conflicts deriving from the interplay between national and European mechanisms for the protection of rights.
  • Combine (national and European) legal materials with a view to build legal arguments concerning the balancing between competing rights and conflicting interests. 

Teaching methods

  • Face-to-face lectures
  • Guest speaker's talks (in class or in distance)
  • Case studies /Incidents (traditional, online)
  • Group assignments
  • Interactive class activities (role playing, business game, simulation, online forum, instant polls)

DETAILS

The learning experience of this course includes, in addition to face-to-face lectures:

  • The discussion of case studies, which are developed throughout the course with a view to follow the development of the topics.
  • Group assignments, which stimulate students’ ability to build legal arguments in the context of the European multilevel legal system.
  • Moreover, students are encouraged to engage in class discussion, to bring their personal understanding of the topics and to share their insights on legal arguments.
  • The course also includes one or two guest lectures by practitioners and judges, aimed at providing students with an understanding of how norms concerning rights are concretely applied.

Assessment methods

  Continuous assessment Partial exams General exam
  • Written individual exam (traditional/online)
    x
  • Group assignment (report, exercise, presentation, project work etc.)
    x
  • Active class participation (virtual, attendance)
x    

ATTENDING STUDENTS

Final one-hour written exam consisting in answering one open question to be chosen among two (80% of the final grade).

Group assignment and presentation in class (20% of the final grade).

 

The open question is particularly designed to test students' ability to critically evaluate potential conflicts deriving from the interplay between national and European mechanisms for the protection of rights.

 

The group assignement and presentation in class is designed to test students' ability to combine (national and European) legal materials with a view to build legal arguments concerning the balancing between competing rights and conflicting interests.

 


NOT ATTENDING STUDENTS

Students sit a written exam, which consist in one open question and 10 multiple-choice questions to be completed in one hour.

 

The open question is designed to test students' ability to critically assess the interplay between national and supreantional protection of fundamental rights.

 

The 10 multiple-choice questions are designed to test students' knowledge of the multilayered system of fundamental rights protection in Europe. 


Teaching materials


ATTENDING AND NOT ATTENDING STUDENTS

  • T.R.S. ALLAN, The Sovereignty of Law: Freedom, Constitution and Common Law, OUP, 2013, chapter 8.
  • G. LETSAS, A Theory of Interpretation of the European Convention on Human Rights, OUP, 2009, chapters 1,2, and 4.
  • E. SPAVENTA, EU Fundamental Rights, in Barnard and Peers Eu Law, OUP second edition 2017, chapter 9.
  • E. SPAVENTA, A Very Fearful Court? The Protection of Fundamental Rights in the EU after Opinion 2/13, (2015) Maastricht Journal of European and Comparative Law 35-56.
  • Case-studies discussed in class and uploaded on the Bboard platform.
  • Other teaching materials are announced before the start of the course and indicated into the Bboard platform.

 

 

Last change 24/08/2020 17:04